Moving from Hollywood to a transnational co-production, Mira Nair’s Monsoon Wedding complicates any simple reading of “Indian” gender roles. The film follows a Punjabi family in Delhi preparing for an arranged marriage. On the surface, it presents a traditional culture where women’s honor is tied to virginity (the cousin Ria reveals past sexual abuse by a family uncle) and men are expected to be providers.
Similarly, postcolonial scholars note that in films from the Global South, the gaze is triply layered: the local male gaze, the internalized colonial gaze (where Western beauty standards dictate who is “desirable”), and the Western audience’s ethnographic gaze. Thus, exploring culture and gender requires us to ask: Who is looking? From which cultural location? And what power is exercised by that look? exploring culture and gender through film ebook
The film’s cultural argument is twofold. First, masculinity is equated with active risk-taking (Jeff’s career covering war zones) and voyeuristic control. Second, femininity is bifurcated: Lisa represents the decorative, erotic spectacle (Mulvey’s “passive image”), while the suspected murderer’s wife represents the punished, domestic woman. Only when Lisa rejects passivity—climbing the fire escape to investigate—does Jeff truly respect her. Yet even then, the camera ensures we watch Lisa through Jeff’s binoculars. Culturally, Rear Window reaffirms 1950s American anxieties: the active woman is an anomaly, and the gaze is the rightful tool of the immobilized (but powerful) white male. Moving from Hollywood to a transnational co-production, Mira
Culturally, the film argues that gender is not a biological given but a set of restrictions (Héloïse forced into marriage) that, when removed, reveal a fluid, egalitarian intimacy. The absence of men and the rejection of the voyeuristic camera angle (Sciamma insists on two-shots and equal eyelines) propose a new cinematic grammar—one where culture is not a prison but a canvas for mutual creation. Similarly, postcolonial scholars note that in films from
However, Mulvey’s theory has been critiqued for its Western-centric assumptions. Cultural theorist bell hooks extended this critique by introducing the concept of the “oppositional gaze.” For Black female spectators in the United States, the pleasure of cinema is complicated by the historical absence or caricature of Black womanhood. Hooks argues that resistance begins when the spectator refuses to identify with the dominant gaze and instead looks critically at the apparatus of looking itself.