Fernández de Lizardi called himself the "Mexican Thinker," and his novel is deeply didactic. Each misadventure of Periquillo is followed by an explicit moral lesson, often delivered by a wise older character. The novel’s final message is clear: honesty, hard work, and prudence lead to a good life, while idleness and greed lead to ruin. Yet, the novel is not a simple moral tract. Periquillo remains a complex, even sympathetic character. His flaws are human, and his suffering is often disproportionate to his crimes. The reader laughs at his schemes but also feels pity when he is beaten, jailed, or left for dead. This tension between moral instruction and narrative empathy gives the novel its lasting vitality.
A notable contradiction lies in the author’s own position. A criollo who supported Mexican independence (the novel was published during the final years of the War of Independence), Fernández de Lizardi was nonetheless wary of radical change. He believed in gradual reform, not revolution. Thus, while the novel criticizes specific abuses, it ultimately endorses a conservative social order: the poor should accept their station and work hard; the rich should be just and charitable. This ambiguity reflects the complex political landscape of early 19th-century Mexico. periquillo sarniento
As the first novel written in Latin America, El Periquillo Sarniento broke new ground. Before it, literary production in the colonies was dominated by religious tracts, chronicles, and poetry in the Baroque style. Fernández de Lizardi adopted a colloquial, accessible prose that mirrored the speech of Mexico City’s streets. He also incorporated local customs, foods, and slang, creating a distinctly Mexican literary voice. Fernández de Lizardi called himself the "Mexican Thinker,"
At its core, El Periquillo Sarniento follows the picaresque tradition, a genre that originated in 16th-century Spain with works like Lazarillo de Tormes . The novel is narrated in the first person by Pedro Sarmiento, nicknamed "Periquillo Sarniento" (a name suggesting both cheekiness and an irritating, itchy quality). As a dying man, he confesses his life story to his children, hoping to guide them away from his own mistakes. Yet, the novel is not a simple moral tract
The novel’s most scathing critique is reserved for the educational system. Periquillo’s early schooling is a farce: teachers are cruel or incompetent, the curriculum is outdated, and rote memorization replaces genuine learning. Through this, Fernández de Lizardi echoes the ideas of Rousseau and Locke, arguing that education should be practical, moral, and suited to the individual’s role in society. Similarly, he condemns the gachupines (peninsular Spaniards) for their arrogance and exploitation of the criollos (Mexican-born Spaniards), subtly critiquing the colonial caste system. At the same time, he does not idealize the lower classes; Periquillo’s time among thieves and beggars shows that vice knows no social boundaries. This balanced cynicism is a hallmark of the picaresque.